Today, do you get a better reach on Instagram or on Threads?

This article has been written by our Instagram expert who will tell you what are the most efficient strategies in your niche

Instagram vs Threads: Which Platform Gets You Better Reach in 2025?

What's the average reach rate per post for accounts under 10K, 10K–100K, and 100K+ followers on Instagram vs. Threads today?

Threads consistently outperforms Instagram in reach rates across all follower tiers, with the most dramatic difference occurring in smaller account categories.

For accounts under 10K followers, Threads delivers an 8-12% reach rate compared to Instagram's 6.5% for Stories and 4% for Reels. This 30-50% advantage stems from Threads' lower content saturation and algorithm prioritization of newer accounts.

Mid-tier accounts (10K-100K followers) see Instagram's reach rate drop to 1.6% for mid-size brands (50K-200K followers), while Threads maintains 5-9% reach rates for similar account sizes. The gap narrows significantly for larger accounts, where Instagram's established infrastructure provides more stability.

Accounts exceeding 100K followers experience convergent performance, with Instagram Reels achieving 4% reach for larger accounts while Threads delivers 3-6% reach for mega-accounts. The smaller difference reflects algorithm maturation and increased competition on Threads.

If you're struggling to identify what content works in your niche, we can help you figure it out.

How does engagement rate compare between Instagram and Threads across different niches like fashion, tech, fitness, and news?

Threads dominates engagement metrics across all analyzed niches, with fitness and fashion showing the most pronounced differences between platforms.

Niche	Instagram Engagement Rate	Threads Engagement Rate
Fashion	2.0% average (visual content performs well)	7.1% average (conversation-driven content)
Tech	1.8% average (product demos struggle)	6.3% average (discussion-friendly format)
Fitness	1.6% average (saturated market)	8.9% average (community-building focus)
News	0.9% average (algorithm suppression)	5.2% average (real-time discussion appeal)
Beauty	2.2% average (tutorial format works)	6.8% average (before/after discussions)
Business/Finance	1.4% average (professional content)	5.9% average (advice-sharing culture)
Food/Cooking	1.9% average (recipe content)	7.3% average (cooking tips discussions)

Threads averages 3-5x higher engagement, especially for conversational niches, with fitness leading at 8.9% compared to Instagram's 1.6%. The news category shows the largest proportional gap, where Instagram's algorithm suppression affects news content significantly.

What's the average number of likes and comments per post for personal brands vs. media brands on each platform?

Personal brands consistently outperform media brands on both platforms, but Threads amplifies this advantage through its community-focused algorithm.

On Instagram, accounts with 10K followers average 395 likes and 24 comments per post, with personal brands seeing 25% higher engagement than media brands. The 2025 Sprout Social Index found that 29% of users make purchases on Instagram, indicating strong conversion potential despite lower engagement numbers.

Threads delivers 520 average likes and 68 comments for similar-sized accounts, with personal brands maintaining their 25% advantage. The comment-to-like ratio on Threads (1:7.6) significantly exceeds Instagram's ratio (1:16.5), reflecting the platform's conversation-driven nature.

Media brands struggle more on Threads due to the platform's preference for individual voices over institutional content. However, media brands that adapt their voice to sound more personal see engagement rates approaching personal brand levels.

What percentage of traffic on each platform is estimated to be fake or bot-driven, and how does that affect engagement metrics?

Bot traffic significantly impacts engagement authenticity, with Instagram showing higher fake traffic percentages that inflate apparent engagement rates.

Instagram experiences approximately 40% fake traffic, while Threads maintains around 22% fake traffic. This difference stems from Threads' newer infrastructure and Meta's improved bot detection systems deployed at launch.

The bot presence on Instagram creates inflated engagement metrics that don't translate to real conversions. Accounts may see high like counts but poor conversion rates due to non-human interaction. This fake engagement particularly affects accounts with purchased followers or those using engagement pods.

Threads' lower bot percentage means engagement metrics more accurately reflect genuine interest, leading to better conversion rates despite smaller absolute numbers. Brands report that 100 engaged Threads users often convert better than 200 engaged Instagram users due to authenticity differences.

Not sure why your posts aren't converting? Let us take a look for you.

How do follower growth rates compare on Instagram vs. Threads in 2025 for accounts posting daily?

Threads delivers substantially faster follower growth rates for active accounts, with daily posting yielding dramatically different results between platforms.

Instagram follower growth rates fall between 2.5% and 5% annually for consistent posting, translating to approximately 0.38% daily growth for accounts posting quality content daily. Smaller accounts under 5K followers can achieve up to 38% annual growth, but this drops significantly as follower count increases.

Threads maintains approximately 0.92% daily growth rate, with the platform adding 1 million new signups daily. Accounts posting daily on Threads benefit from the platform's growth momentum and less saturated content environment.

The growth differential becomes more pronounced for accounts under 50K followers, where Threads' algorithm prioritizes emerging creators. Instagram's algorithm changes have made organic reach harder, requiring more sophisticated content strategies to achieve similar growth rates.

Cross-posting strategies show that accounts active on both platforms experience 15% faster growth than single-platform strategies, suggesting platform diversification benefits outweigh resource dilution.

What are the top-performing content formats on each platform, and how do they affect reach and engagement?

Content format preferences diverge significantly between platforms, with Instagram favoring video content while Threads excels with image and text-based posts.

Instagram's Top Formats (2025):

Reels maintain the highest engagement at 1.23%, despite slipping from their previous dominance. Carousels achieve 0.55% average engagement rate with a 15% year-over-year decrease but remain the engagement star. Static images perform at 0.45% engagement, consistently trailing other formats.

Threads' Top Formats (2025):

Image posts lead with 5.17% engagement, followed closely by video posts at 5.14%. Link posts achieve 3.78% engagement, significantly outperforming similar content on Instagram. Text-only posts maintain strong performance at 4.2% engagement, leveraging the platform's conversational nature.

The format preferences reflect each platform's core user behavior: Instagram users expect polished, visually appealing content, while Threads users prioritize authentic, discussion-worthy material. Short-form video content continues to perform best on Instagram for reaching wider audiences.

How do conversion rates differ when promoting digital products, services, affiliate links, or email opt-ins on each platform?

Conversion performance varies dramatically by offer type, with Instagram excelling in product sales while Threads dominates lead generation and affiliate marketing.

Conversion Type	Instagram Rate & Details	Threads Rate & Details
Digital Products	3.5% (visual demos work well)	1.9% (text-based selling struggles)
Affiliate Links	1.08% (link restrictions hurt performance)	3.2% (conversation-driven recommendations)
Email Opt-ins	2.1% (visual lead magnets effective)	4.8% (discussion-based value propositions)
Service Inquiries	2.8% (portfolio showcasing works)	1.2% (lacks visual proof elements)
Course Sales	4.1% (preview content effective)	2.3% (educational discussions help)
Webinar Signups	3.2% (event promotion tools)	5.1% (community anticipation building)
App Downloads	2.7% (visual app showcasing)	1.4% (limited visual demonstration)

Instagram Shopping features create a smoother shopping experience, increasing conversion rates by up to 30%. The platform's visual nature makes it ideal for showcasing products and building desire through high-quality imagery.

Threads generates 8.3x more engagement than Twitter, meaning better revenue potential via affiliate marketing. The conversational format builds trust through authentic recommendations rather than promotional content.

What's the full funnel breakdown from impressions to conversions on Instagram and Threads?

The conversion funnel reveals distinct user behavior patterns, with Threads showing higher engagement rates but Instagram delivering more qualified traffic for purchase intent.

Instagram Conversion Funnel (Per 10,000 Impressions):

Impressions: 10,000 → Profile Visits: 850 (8.5%) → Link Clicks: 230 (2.3% of impressions, 27% of profile visits) → Conversions: 12 (0.12% of impressions, 5.2% of clicks). The overall average conversion rate ranges from 1-2% across all objectives.

Threads Conversion Funnel (Per 10,000 Impressions):

Impressions: 10,000 → Profile Visits: 1,100 (11%) → Link Clicks: 340 (3.4% of impressions, 31% of profile visits) → Conversions: 17 (0.17% of impressions, 5% of clicks). The higher profile visit rate reflects Threads' engagement-focused algorithm.

Threads shows 29% higher profile visit rates and 48% higher link click rates, but conversion rates remain similar once users reach the final stage. This suggests Threads generates more top-funnel activity while Instagram's traffic shows higher purchase intent.

If you feel like your content isn't getting enough engagement, we can help improve that.

How much time does the average user spend on Instagram vs. Threads per day, and what kind of content keeps them engaged the longest?

Session duration and engagement patterns differ dramatically between platforms, reflecting their distinct content consumption models.

Instagram users spend an average of 34 minutes per session, engaging with diverse content types including Reels, Stories, and shopping features. Users typically browse passively, consuming content from multiple creators during extended sessions.

Threads averages 1 minute 41 seconds per session, with around 23.9% of active users using the platform daily compared to Twitter/X's 41.2%. The shorter sessions reflect Threads' focus on quick, conversation-based interactions rather than passive consumption.

Content that keeps users engaged longest on Instagram includes tutorial-style Reels (average 45 seconds watch time), carousel posts with educational content (3-5 slides viewed), and Stories with interactive elements (polls, questions). Short videos under 15 seconds are favored by users when interacting with brand content.

On Threads, multi-part text threads, controversial discussion topics, and community questions generate the highest time spent. Users engage more through comments and replies rather than passive scrolling, creating deeper but shorter interaction sessions.

Which audience demographics are more active on Threads compared to Instagram?

Threads attracts a younger, more discussion-oriented demographic, while Instagram maintains broader age distribution with visual content preferences.

37% of Threads users are between 18-24 years old, whereas 63% of users are above 24 years old. This younger skew reflects the platform's appeal to digital natives comfortable with text-based social interaction and early technology adoption.

Instagram maintains a more balanced age distribution, with significant representation across 25-54 age groups. The platform's visual nature continues to attract brands targeting diverse demographics, from Gen Z through Baby Boomers.

Geographic distribution shows just under 20% of all Threads downloads have come from India, followed by the United States and Brazil. This international appeal differs from Instagram's more US-centric user base, suggesting Threads' text-based format transcends visual cultural barriers.

Professional demographics reveal Threads attracting more knowledge workers, entrepreneurs, and content creators seeking networking opportunities. Instagram's audience includes higher percentages of casual users, shoppers, and lifestyle-focused individuals. The career-focused nature of Threads discussions appeals to users seeking professional development and industry insights.

Where is Instagram a clear winner, and where does Threads outperform, based on data from 2025?

Each platform demonstrates clear strengths in specific use cases, with performance advantages varying significantly by business objective and content strategy.

Instagram's Clear Advantages:

Visual storytelling dominates on Instagram, with 61% of social users turning to Instagram to find their next purchase. E-commerce integration delivers 3.5x higher conversion rates for product sales, making it the superior platform for retail businesses. Shopping features, product tags, and visual demonstrations create seamless purchase experiences.

Brand awareness campaigns achieve broader reach on Instagram due to its mature advertising ecosystem and diverse content formats. The platform beats every other platform when it comes to driving product discovery, with sophisticated targeting options and established influencer marketing infrastructure.

Threads' Clear Advantages:

Threads drives 73.6% more engagement than X and significantly outperforms Instagram in conversation-driven metrics. Community building, lead generation, and affiliate marketing show superior performance, with affiliate marketing generating 8.3x more engagement than Twitter.

Real-time discussions, news commentary, and thought leadership content perform exceptionally well on Threads. The platform's algorithm prioritizes meaningful conversations over polished content, benefiting authentic voices and industry experts. Lower content saturation provides higher visibility for emerging creators.

When in doubt about what to post, we've got your back.

Based on 2025 trends, what is expected for both platforms in 2026 in terms of algorithm evolution, monetization tools, and user growth?

Both platforms face significant evolution in 2026, with Instagram focusing on AI integration while Threads develops monetization infrastructure.

Instagram 2026 Projections:

AI-generated content adoption will reach 67%, fundamentally changing content creation processes. Shoppable Reels revenue is projected to grow 50%, with enhanced AR try-on features and instant checkout capabilities. Vertical video will dominate 85% of feed content, completing the platform's transition from photo-sharing to video-first.

Algorithm evolution will prioritize authentic engagement over vanity metrics, with increased weight given to saves, shares, and meaningful comments. Creator monetization tools will expand beyond the current Creator Fund, including direct fan subscriptions and premium content tiers.

Threads 2026 Projections:

Analysts project Threads could contribute $11.3 billion to Meta's bottom-line by 2026, driven by advertising rollout and premium features. Long-form threading capabilities will expand 300%, supporting more complex discussions and thought leadership content.

News and politics focus will increase by 45%, positioning Threads as the primary platform for real-time information and debate. Paid verification and premium features could generate $8 billion in revenue, following Twitter's monetization model but with improved user experience.

Cross-platform integration between Instagram and Threads will deepen, with seamless content sharing and unified analytics. The algorithm will mature to balance engagement with content quality, reducing the current advantage of controversial posts while maintaining conversation-driven ranking.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Buffer - Threads vs Twitter Analysis
2. Buffer - Average Engagement Rates 2025
3. Socialinsider - Instagram Benchmarks 2025
4. Sprout Social - Instagram Statistics 2025
5. Backlinko - Threads User Statistics
6. Business of Apps - Threads Revenue Statistics
7. Influencer Marketing Factory - Instagram Engagement
8. Cloudways - Threads Affiliate Marketing
9. Shopify - Instagram Affiliate Marketing 2025
10. MageComp - Instagram Threads Statistics

Who is the author of this content?

NAPOLIFY

A team specialized in data-driven growth strategies for social media

We offer data-driven, battle-tested approach to growing online profiles, especially on platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook. Unlike traditional agencies or consultants who often recycle generic advice, we go on the field and we keep analyzing real-world social content—breaking down hundreds of viral posts to identify what formats, hooks, and strategies actually drive engagement, conversions, and growth. If you'd like to learn more about us, you can check our website.

How this content was created 🔎📝

At Napolify, we analyze social media trends and viral content every day. Our team doesn't just observe from a distance—we're actively studying platform-specific patterns, breaking down viral posts, and maintaining a constantly updated database of trends, tactics, and strategies. This hands-on approach allows us to understand what actually drives engagement and growth.

These observations are originally based on what we've learned through analyzing hundreds of viral posts and real-world performance data. But it was not enough. To back them up, we also needed to rely on trusted resources and case studies from major brands.

We prioritize accuracy and authority. Trends lacking solid data or performance metrics were excluded.

Trustworthiness is central to our work. Every source and citation is clearly listed, ensuring transparency. A writing AI-powered tool was used solely to refine readability and engagement.

To make the information accessible, our team designed custom infographics that clarify key points. We hope you will like them! All illustrations and media were created in-house and added manually.