Today, do you make more money on Instagram or on Facebook?
This article has been written by our Instagram expert who will tell you what are the most efficient strategies in your niche
We will tell you what works for your niche on social media
The monetization battle between Instagram and Facebook has shifted dramatically in 2025, with platform-specific revenue streams favoring different creator goals.
Instagram dominates visual storytelling and brand partnerships, while Facebook excels in conversion-focused sales and community building. Instagram creators with 100k+ followers earn $1,500-$15,000 per sponsored post, but Facebook drives 9.21% conversion rates versus Instagram's 1.08% for direct sales.
And if you need help with your social media, our team can take a look and help you grow more efficiently.
Summary
Instagram leads in sponsored content revenue while Facebook dominates conversion efficiency. Both platforms face bot inflation challenges but serve distinct monetization strategies.
| Metric | Instagram Performance | Facebook Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Sponsored Post Revenue (100k+ followers) | $1,500-$15,000 per post | ~$13,000+ for macro-influencers (500k+) |
| Average Engagement Rate | 3.0% (fashion), 2.19% (fitness nano-influencers) | 0.15% median across niches |
| Conversion Rate | 1.08% for direct sales | 9.21% for direct sales |
| Average Order Value | $65 (fashion) | $55 (fashion) |
| Daily Time Spent | 33.1 minutes (53 for Gen Z) | 30.9 minutes |
| Fake Account Impact | ~10% of accounts (200M+ bots) | 1.1B fake accounts removed Q3 2024 |
| Creator Program RPM | Reels Bonus (undisclosed rates) | $8.17 CPM for In-Stream Ads |
How much revenue does an average creator make per month on Instagram versus Facebook, broken down by follower count brackets?
Instagram creators see clear revenue progression across follower tiers, with micro-influencers earning $100-$200 per sponsored post (1k-10k followers) while mega-influencers command $1,500-$15,000 per post (100k+).
| Follower Count | Instagram Revenue Per Post | Facebook Revenue Per Post |
|---|---|---|
| 1k-10k followers | $100-$200 per sponsored post | Limited sponsored content opportunities |
| 10k-100k followers | $200-$1,000 per sponsored post | Revenue primarily from ad-revenue sharing |
| 100k+ followers | $1,500-$15,000 per sponsored post | ~$13,000+ for macro-influencers (500k+) |
| Revenue Source | Sponsored posts, affiliate marketing, Reels bonuses | Ad-revenue sharing, community monetization |
| Monthly Potential | 4-8 sponsored posts for active creators | Consistent ad revenue but lower per-post rates |
| Brand Partnership Rate | Higher due to visual-first content | Lower but better for community-based brands |
| Qualification Requirements | 10k+ followers for most programs | 10k+ followers plus community engagement |
What are the average engagement rates per post for Instagram and Facebook, segmented by niche?
Instagram consistently outperforms Facebook across all content niches, with fashion achieving 3.0% engagement rates compared to Facebook's 0.15% median.
Nano-influencers on Instagram drive significantly higher engagement, with fitness creators achieving 2.19% rates while educational content peaks at 4.2%. Facebook's engagement struggles stem from bot inflation and algorithm changes prioritizing meaningful conversations over passive content consumption.
Entertainment agencies on Instagram maintain 3.4% engagement rates, demonstrating the platform's visual-first advantage for creator monetization strategies.
How does audience behavior differ between Instagram and Facebook in terms of content engagement?
Instagram users prioritize visual storytelling through Reels (1.23% engagement) and carousels (0.99% engagement), while Facebook audiences engage more with long-form video and live community interactions.
Reels dominate Instagram engagement metrics, outperforming static posts by 75% and driving the platform's monetization algorithms. Stories excel for time-sensitive promotions and discount announcements, creating urgency-driven purchase behaviors.
Facebook users spend longer sessions consuming community-focused content, with Groups and live streams fostering deeper creator-audience relationships that translate to higher conversion rates despite lower overall engagement numbers.
The platform preference reflects generational divides: Gen Z dedicates 53 minutes daily to Instagram's visual content, while Facebook's 35+ demographic values discussion-based community interactions over quick visual consumption.
What are the average conversion rates for selling different product types on both platforms?
Facebook destroys Instagram in direct sales conversion efficiency, achieving 9.21% conversion rates compared to Instagram's 1.08% across digital and physical products.
| Product Type | Instagram Conversion | Facebook Conversion | Best Platform |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Products | 1.08% | 9.21% | |
| Physical Products | 1.08% | 9.21% | |
| Affiliate Links | 1-3% | 5-7% | |
| B2B Services | Limited data | Higher conversion rates | |
| Coaching/Consulting | Visual storytelling advantage | Community trust building | Platform-dependent |
| Subscription Services | Influencer-driven sign-ups | Direct response advertising | |
| E-commerce | Impulse buying through Stories | Considered purchases via Groups | Mixed |
What percentage of traffic on both platforms comes from bots, and how does this affect monetization?
Instagram harbors approximately 10% fake accounts (200M+ bots) while Facebook removed 1.1 billion fake accounts in Q3 2024 alone, indicating massive bot presence across both platforms.
Bot traffic reduces genuine engagement rates by 30-50%, artificially inflating follower counts while decreasing authentic interaction metrics that brands value for partnerships. This inflation costs advertisers $20 billion annually in wasted ad spend on click fraud.
Creators face reduced monetization opportunities when bot followers dilute their authentic engagement rates, making them less attractive to brand partnerships that prioritize genuine audience connection over vanity metrics.
If you're struggling to identify what content works in your niche, we can help you figure it out.
Which platform generates higher average order values when followers make purchases?
Instagram users spend more per transaction with a $65 average order value in fashion compared to Facebook's $55, but Facebook drives significantly higher purchase frequency.
The spending pattern reflects platform demographics: Instagram's younger audience makes impulsive, higher-value purchases driven by visual content and influencer recommendations. Facebook's older demographic exercises more purchase consideration but converts more reliably once committed.
Beauty and luxury niches see the highest Instagram order values, while Facebook excels in practical product categories where community recommendations and detailed reviews influence purchasing decisions.
What does the conversion funnel look like for Instagram and Facebook, including drop-off rates?
Instagram suffers high drop-off rates between clicks and engagement due to Reels prioritizing passive viewing, while Facebook struggles with reach limitations but maintains better engagement-to-conversion ratios.
Instagram's typical funnel shows strong initial reach (3.50% organic reach) but experiences significant drops when users transition from passive Reels consumption to active engagement. The platform's 28% year-over-year engagement decline (0.50% in 2025) reflects algorithm changes favoring entertainment over conversion-focused content.
Facebook's funnel demonstrates weaker organic reach (1.65%) but stronger conversion efficiency once users engage with content, particularly in community-driven environments where trust and recommendations drive purchase behaviors.
The critical difference lies in intent: Instagram captures attention through visual discovery, while Facebook converts through social proof and community validation, making Facebook superior for bottom-funnel monetization despite lower top-funnel performance.
How do session times on each platform impact content visibility and monetization potential?
Instagram users spend 33.1 minutes daily (53 minutes for Gen Z) consuming rapid-fire visual content, while Facebook users dedicate 30.9 minutes to deeper community interactions.
Instagram's shorter attention spans favor quick monetization through impulse purchases and instant gratification content, with Reels driving immediate purchase decisions through visual storytelling and product demonstrations.
Facebook's longer session engagement supports complex sales processes, educational content, and community-building activities that nurture customer relationships over time, resulting in higher lifetime value despite slower initial conversion.
The monetization advantage depends on strategy: Instagram excels for direct response campaigns and influencer-driven sales, while Facebook builds sustainable revenue through community loyalty and repeat purchases.
Not sure why your posts aren't converting? Let us take a look for you.
How have monetization trends and algorithm priorities changed on both platforms in 2025?
Instagram's 2025 algorithm heavily favors Reels content with authentic user-generated content and consistent posting schedules, while Facebook prioritizes community signals through Groups and long-form engagement.
Instagram introduced undisclosed Reels bonus programs requiring 100k+ followers and high-quality video content, shifting monetization toward entertainment-first creators rather than traditional influencers. The platform's emphasis on "authentic" content has reduced reach for overly promotional posts.
Facebook's monetization evolution focuses on meaningful interactions, with In-Stream Ads paying $8.17 CPM and new community-based monetization tools launching throughout 2025. The platform rewards creators who build engaged communities rather than individual follower counts.
AI-driven engagement tools and chatbots have become essential for conversion optimization, with successful creators integrating automated responses and personalized content recommendations to boost monetization efficiency across both platforms.
What are the current creator program payouts and qualification requirements?
Instagram's Reels Bonus program maintains undisclosed revenue-per-mille rates while requiring 100k+ followers and original video content, whereas Facebook's In-Stream Ads offer transparent $8.17 CPM payments.
Instagram qualification demands 10k+ followers, consistent original content creation, and adherence to community guidelines, with bonus availability varying by region and creator performance metrics. The platform prioritizes video creators over static content producers.
Facebook's creator programs require 10k+ followers plus demonstrated community engagement through meaningful interactions, comments, and Group participation. The platform values community builders over individual content creators.
Revenue-sharing programs across both platforms are projected to grow 30% year-over-year, with Meta investing heavily in creator retention through improved monetization tools and expanded qualification criteria for emerging creators.
How should creators choose between Instagram and Facebook based on their specific goals?
Instagram dominates brand partnerships and visual storytelling monetization, while Facebook excels in direct sales conversion and community-driven revenue generation.
| Goal | Recommended Platform | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Community Building | Groups foster deeper connections and sustained engagement | |
| Affiliate Income | Visual storytelling drives higher click-through rates | |
| Direct Sales | 9.21% conversion rate vs Instagram's 1.08% | |
| Brand Partnerships | Higher sponsored post rates and visual content preference | |
| B2B Services | Professional networking and trust-building capabilities | |
| Quick Monetization | Faster follower growth and immediate partnership opportunities | |
| Sustainable Revenue | Higher conversion rates and customer lifetime value |
What are the forecasts for content formats and monetization tools heading into 2026?
Short-form video content will dominate both platforms with AI-generated content rising significantly, while creator revenue-sharing programs expand 30% year-over-year through 2026.
Instagram will maintain Gen Z adoption leadership while Facebook focuses on the 35+ demographic, creating distinct monetization ecosystems based on generational preferences and spending behaviors.
Platform monetization tools will integrate advanced AI features for automated content optimization, personalized audience targeting, and real-time conversion tracking, reducing the manual effort required for successful creator monetization.
TikTok's influence will force both platforms to accelerate innovation in creator monetization, with Instagram introducing new Reels features and Facebook expanding community-based revenue streams to retain creator talent.
If you feel like your content isn't getting enough engagement, we can help improve that.
Conclusion
Instagram excels in visual monetization and brand partnerships, commanding higher sponsored post rates but struggling with conversion efficiency.
Facebook dominates direct sales conversion and community building, offering sustainable revenue through higher purchase rates despite lower engagement metrics.
Sources
- Later - Instagram Influencers Costs
- EmbedSocial - Instagram Influencers Income
- Limelight Digital - Influencer Earnings
- Buffer - Average Engagement Rates
- Shopify - Social Media Conversion Rates
- Statista - Facebook Fake Account Removal
- Vidico - Instagram Reels Statistics
- Cropink - Time Spent on Instagram
- Gupta Media - Social Media Ads Cost
- Social Insider - Social Media Benchmarks
Read more articles
-How to Make More Money: Instagram vs Pinterest
-Instagram vs LinkedIn: Which Platform Pays Better
-Instagram vs YouTube: Revenue Comparison Guide
-Instagram vs Threads: Monetization Strategies
-Faceless Instagram Account Earnings Guide
