Today, do you get a better CAC on TikTok or on YouTube?
This article has been written by our TikTok expert who will tell you what are the most efficient strategies in your niche

We will tell you what works for your niche on social media
Calculate
your CAC
A free tool we have made so you can calculate your target Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC).
CALCULATETikTok currently delivers lower customer acquisition costs than YouTube across most industries, with average CAC ranging from $0.70 to $129 depending on the niche, while YouTube commands higher rates but offers superior conversion values for educational and affiliate content.
The critical factor isn't just the upfront cost—it's understanding how each platform's unique audience behavior, engagement patterns, and monetization features align with your specific product type and business model. TikTok excels at impulse purchases and trend-driven products, while YouTube dominates in high-consideration purchases and educational content that requires deeper audience trust.
And if you need help with your social media, our team can take a look and help you grow more efficiently.
Summary
TikTok offers lower acquisition costs and higher engagement rates for younger demographics, while YouTube provides better long-term conversion value and external traffic generation capabilities.
Metric | TikTok Performance | YouTube Performance |
---|---|---|
Average CAC | $0.70-$129 (CPM: $3.21, CR: 0.46%) | Higher upfront costs (CPM: $3.67) but $4.70 per 1K views for affiliates |
Engagement Rates | 6.8-7.5% (<100K followers), drops to 2.8% (10M+) | 5.91% average for Shorts, prioritizes watch time over interactions |
Primary Demographics | 25-34 age group (35.3%), 55.7% male, Gen Z dominance | Broader age range, 25-34 largest (21.3%), balanced gender split |
Daily Usage | 58 minutes/day, trend-focused content | 47.5 minutes/day, educational and long-form content |
Conversion Strengths | Impulse purchases (55% of orders), TikTok Shop AOV: $43 | Researched purchases, affiliate value: $4.70/1K views |
External Traffic | Limited (business accounts only), CTR: 0.5-1.5% | Strong link support, CTR: 2-10% |
Bot Traffic Risk | Up to 97% automated traffic in some cases | Robust fraud detection, minimal bot impact |
What's the current average customer acquisition cost (CAC) for TikTok versus YouTube across industries?
TikTok maintains significantly lower customer acquisition costs compared to YouTube, with CPM averaging $3.21 versus YouTube's $3.67.
The conversion rate on TikTok sits at 0.46% for optimized campaigns, translating to approximately $0.70 per acquisition for basic campaigns. However, competitive industries like fashion and accessories see much higher costs, with CAC reaching $129 per customer due to increased bidding competition.
YouTube's CAC calculation becomes more complex because the platform excels in different conversion scenarios. While the upfront CPM is higher, affiliate-driven content on YouTube generates $4.70 per 1,000 views compared to TikTok's $2.90. This means YouTube often delivers better long-term value despite higher initial costs.
Industry variations are substantial on both platforms. E-commerce brands typically see higher CAC due to competitive bidding, while B2B companies report 1.8x better results on TikTok compared to traditional lead generation channels. Service-based businesses often find YouTube more cost-effective due to the platform's educational content format and higher search intent.
What are the average engagement rates per post on TikTok and YouTube Shorts by niche and account size?
TikTok engagement rates follow a clear inverse relationship with follower count, starting at 6.8-7.5% for accounts under 100K followers and dropping to 2.8% for accounts with over 10 million followers.
Account Size | TikTok Engagement Rate | Performance Notes |
---|---|---|
Under 10K followers | 6.8-7.5% | Micro-influencers see up to 17.96% in specific niches |
100K-500K followers | ~5.2% | Sweet spot for brand partnerships |
500K-1M followers | ~4.4% | Declining interaction density as reach scales |
1M-5M followers | ~3.2% | Shares and saves remain more stable than likes |
5M-10M followers | ~3.0% | Algorithm reach becomes more selective |
10M+ followers | ~2.8% | Massive reach but lower percentage engagement |
YouTube Shorts Average | 5.91% | Outperforms Instagram Reels (5.53%) but varies by niche |
Niche performance varies dramatically on TikTok. Educational content achieves the highest engagement at 9.5%, followed by food and drink content at 6-8%. Entertainment content, despite being popular, only averages 4.25% engagement. YouTube Shorts maintains a more consistent 5.91% across niches but shows particular strength in food content (989K average views per video) and entertainment (17% of total views).
If you're struggling to identify what content works in your niche, we can help you figure it out.
How do likes, comments, and shares per post compare on both platforms for creators under 10K, 100K, and 1M+ followers?
TikTok shows higher interaction density across all follower tiers, with micro-influencers under 10K followers achieving remarkable 17.96% engagement rates through strong community connections.
For creators under 10K followers, TikTok's algorithm actively promotes content discovery, leading to disproportionately high engagement. Comments and shares are particularly strong at this level because the audience feels more connected to smaller creators. The platform's recommendation algorithm also favors fresh accounts, giving new creators significant visibility opportunities.
At the 100K-1M follower range, TikTok engagement rates settle around 4.4-5.2%. Comments begin declining more rapidly than likes, but shares and saves maintain steadier performance. This suggests that while casual engagement drops, content quality remains high enough for users to save or share valuable posts.
For creators exceeding 1M followers, TikTok engagement drops to approximately 2.8-3.2%. However, the absolute numbers remain substantial—a 2.8% engagement rate on 10 million followers still generates 280,000 interactions per post. YouTube's data on follower-specific engagement remains limited, but the platform's algorithm prioritizes watch time and retention over raw interaction metrics, making direct comparison challenging.
What are the typical conversion rates from views to leads or sales on TikTok versus YouTube, broken down by revenue streams?
Conversion performance varies dramatically by revenue stream, with TikTok excelling in impulse purchases while YouTube dominates educational and affiliate conversions.
Revenue Stream | TikTok Performance | YouTube Performance |
---|---|---|
Affiliate Links | CTR: 0.5-1.5%, impulse-driven conversions | $4.70 per 1K views, higher consideration purchases |
Course Sales | Limited data, trend-based promotion works best | 3-5% conversion rate via educational tutorials |
Service Sales | B2B: 1.8x better ROI than traditional channels | Strong for consultative selling and demonstrations |
Physical Products | TikTok Shop AOV: $43, 55% impulse orders | Limited native shopping, relies on external links |
Lead Generation | High volume, lower quality leads | Lower volume, higher-intent qualified leads |
Brand Awareness | Viral potential, short-term memory | Longer retention, SEO benefits |
App Downloads | Strong for gaming and social apps | Better for utility and productivity apps |
TikTok's strength lies in spontaneous purchasing decisions, with 55% of Gen Z users making impulse purchases directly through the app. The platform's short-form format creates urgency and FOMO that drives immediate action. However, this same format struggles with complex products requiring explanation or demonstration.
YouTube's longer format allows for detailed product explanations, tutorials, and reviews that build trust before purchase. This results in higher-value conversions but requires more sophisticated content creation and longer sales cycles.
How does the audience differ between TikTok and YouTube in terms of demographics, purchasing intent, and engagement behaviors?
TikTok skews toward younger demographics with higher impulse purchasing behavior, while YouTube attracts a broader age range with more research-oriented shopping habits.
TikTok's user base consists of 55.7% male and 44.3% female users, with the 25-34 age group representing 35.3% of the platform. Despite common perception, the largest demographic isn't teenagers but young adults in their late twenties and early thirties. These users spend an average of 58 minutes daily on the platform, primarily consuming trend-based content and participating in challenges.
YouTube maintains a more balanced demographic distribution, with the 25-34 age group representing 21.3% of users and more even gender representation. Users spend 47.5 minutes daily on the platform but engage with longer-form, educational content. This creates fundamentally different engagement patterns—TikTok users scroll rapidly through short videos, while YouTube users invest time in specific content pieces.
Purchasing intent differs significantly between platforms. TikTok users demonstrate high spontaneous buying behavior, with 58% shopping directly within the app. This aligns with the platform's entertainment-first approach where products are discovered accidentally during content consumption. YouTube users exhibit more intentional behavior, often arriving through search queries or subscriptions to channels they trust for advice and reviews.
Not sure why your posts aren't converting? Let us take a look for you.
Which platform drives more traffic to external websites, and what is the average click-through rate (CTR) per post or video?
YouTube significantly outperforms TikTok in driving external traffic due to its superior link integration and search-oriented user behavior.
TikTok restricts external links to business accounts only, immediately limiting most creators' ability to drive traffic. Even with business accounts, the platform's design philosophy prioritizes keeping users within the app ecosystem. This results in CTR rates of 0.5-1.5% for standard content, though TopView ads can achieve 8-12% CTR through premium placement and full-screen experience.
YouTube allows links in descriptions, cards, and end screens for all creators, creating multiple touchpoints for external traffic generation. The platform's CTR ranges from 2-10%, with educational and review content typically performing on the higher end. YouTube's search functionality also creates evergreen traffic opportunities—videos continue driving clicks months or years after publication.
The user mindset differs substantially between platforms. TikTok users rarely expect to leave the app and often view external links as interruptions to their entertainment experience. YouTube users frequently arrive with research intent and expect to find additional resources, making them more likely to click through to external sites for deeper information or purchases.
Which platform delivers higher retention and watch time metrics, and how does that influence conversion at the bottom of the funnel?
YouTube delivers superior retention and watch time metrics that translate to stronger bottom-funnel conversions, while TikTok excels at top-funnel awareness and engagement.
TikTok's Focused View ads demonstrate 53% higher watch time and 2.8x completion rates compared to standard formats. However, the platform's short-form nature limits absolute watch time—even highly engaging content under 90 seconds retains only 50% of viewers. This creates excellent top-funnel awareness but challenges deeper engagement required for complex purchase decisions.
YouTube's algorithm prioritizes retention above all other metrics, with videos over 54 seconds achieving 6.7% engagement rates. Long-form content exceeding 15 minutes shows particular strength in nurturing viewers through consideration phases. This extended engagement time allows creators to build trust, demonstrate expertise, and address objections—critical factors for high-value conversions.
Bottom-funnel impact varies by product complexity. TikTok's quick hooks and immediate calls-to-action work exceptionally well for impulse purchases, subscription apps, and low-consideration products. YouTube's extended format proves superior for services, courses, B2B solutions, and any product requiring explanation or demonstration before purchase.
The retention advantage translates directly to conversion quality. YouTube viewers who watch longer-form content show higher purchase intent and lower return rates, while TikTok converts more users overall but with higher churn and lower lifetime value.
Where do users typically spend more money—TikTok Shop or YouTube-integrated store features—and what's the average order value?
TikTok Shop dominates in transaction volume and user adoption, while YouTube's integrated shopping features focus on higher-value purchases through affiliate relationships.
TikTok Shop generates an average order value of $43, driven primarily by impulse purchases and trend-based products. The platform's live shopping features create urgency through limited-time offers and real-time interaction with sellers. 55% of Gen Z users make purchases directly within the app, making TikTok Shop a significant revenue driver for consumer goods, fashion, and beauty products.
YouTube's shopping integration remains less developed but focuses on higher-value conversions. The platform's affiliate ecosystem generates $4.70 per 1,000 views, significantly higher than TikTok's affiliate value. YouTube creators typically promote products through detailed reviews, tutorials, and comparison videos that justify higher price points and build stronger purchase conviction.
Transaction patterns reveal platform-specific behaviors. TikTok Shop thrives on spontaneous purchases made during casual browsing sessions. Users discover products accidentally while consuming entertainment content. YouTube shopping occurs after deliberate research, with users actively seeking product information and recommendations from trusted creators.
If you feel like your content isn't getting enough engagement, we can help improve that.
How much of the traffic on each platform comes from fake accounts, bots, or incentivized views, and how does that affect CAC?
TikTok faces significant bot traffic challenges with up to 97% automated traffic in some campaigns, while YouTube maintains more robust fraud detection systems.
TikTok's rapid growth and algorithmic promotion have attracted substantial bot activity. Studies indicate that automated traffic can represent anywhere from 30% to 97% of views in poorly managed campaigns. This bot traffic inflates view counts and engagement metrics but doesn't convert to actual sales, artificially raising effective CAC calculations. The platform's limited countermeasures mean advertisers must implement their own fraud detection or risk paying for non-human traffic.
YouTube employs more sophisticated fraud detection algorithms that identify and remove fake subscribers, views, and engagement. While bot traffic exists, it represents a smaller percentage of overall platform activity. Fake subscribers can harm channel credibility and reduce organic reach, but the platform's mature systems better protect advertisers from paying for fraudulent traffic.
The CAC impact varies by campaign type and targeting sophistication. TikTok advertisers using broad targeting or low-cost campaigns face higher bot exposure, potentially doubling effective acquisition costs. Precise targeting and premium ad formats show lower bot infiltration but require higher initial investment. YouTube's fraud protection means more predictable CAC calculations, though premium placement costs offset some savings.
What has changed in TikTok and YouTube's CAC dynamics, algorithm, and ad efficiency in 2025?
Both platforms have implemented significant algorithm updates in 2025 that favor longer engagement and higher-quality content, directly impacting CAC efficiency.
TikTok introduced Focused View ads that prioritize 6-second minimum watch times, resulting in 53% higher engagement and 2.8x completion rates. This shift toward quality engagement has improved conversion rates but increased competition for premium placements. B2B advertisers report 1.8x better lead generation results compared to traditional channels, indicating improved targeting capabilities for business audiences.
YouTube has prioritized Shorts in discovery algorithms while maintaining long-form content advantages for SEO and search rankings. The platform's enhanced shopping integrations, including product tagging and direct checkout features, have improved conversion tracking and attribution. This creates more accurate CAC measurements and better optimization opportunities for e-commerce advertisers.
Algorithm changes have increased content quality requirements on both platforms. TikTok now penalizes low-effort content and repetitive posting, while rewarding authentic engagement and original content. YouTube continues emphasizing retention metrics, with videos maintaining viewer attention beyond 54 seconds receiving algorithmic preference and achieving 6.7% engagement rates.
Ad efficiency improvements include better audience targeting, improved conversion tracking, and enhanced creative optimization tools. Both platforms have invested in machine learning systems that reduce wasted ad spend on unlikely converters, though TikTok's bot traffic challenges continue affecting some campaign types.
What are the projected trends for CAC, creator monetization potential, and platform growth heading into 2026?
Industry projections indicate rising competition will increase CAC on both platforms, while creator monetization opportunities expand through enhanced shopping features and direct payment systems.
Short-form video advertising spend is projected to reach $100 billion by 2025, driving increased competition and higher acquisition costs across both platforms. TikTok's CAC is expected to rise 15-25% as the platform matures and premium inventory becomes scarcer. YouTube's established advertising ecosystem may see more modest 8-15% increases, offset by improved targeting efficiency and conversion optimization.
Creator monetization potential shows strong growth trajectories. TikTok Shop is projected to generate $17.5 billion in US revenue during 2025, creating significant earning opportunities for content creators through product partnerships and affiliate programs. YouTube's creator economy continues expanding beyond ad revenue, with enhanced shopping features, channel memberships, and direct fan funding creating diverse income streams.
Platform growth patterns suggest different trajectories. TikTok's user acquisition is slowing in mature markets but expanding rapidly in emerging economies, potentially affecting audience quality and purchasing power in specific regions. YouTube maintains steady growth across all demographics, with particular strength in educational and professional content consumption.
Monetization tools will become more sophisticated, with both platforms investing in creator-friendly features like automated merchandise stores, integrated payment processing, and advanced analytics. These improvements should reduce friction in the creator-to-consumer transaction process, potentially improving conversion rates and lowering effective CAC for creator-driven campaigns.
How should someone choose between investing in TikTok or YouTube based on their niche, product type, content production capacity, and audience targeting strategy?
Platform selection should align with product complexity, target demographics, content creation resources, and long-term business objectives rather than following generic best practices.
Choose TikTok for products and services that benefit from impulse purchases, visual demonstration, and trend association. Fashion, beauty, food, gaming, and lifestyle products perform exceptionally well due to the platform's entertainment-first environment. The platform suits businesses targeting Gen Z and millennial audiences with disposable income for spontaneous purchases. TikTok requires consistent content creation and trend monitoring but offers lower barriers to viral growth.
Select YouTube for educational products, high-consideration purchases, and complex services requiring detailed explanation. Courses, consulting services, B2B solutions, technology products, and subscription services benefit from YouTube's longer format and search functionality. The platform excels for businesses targeting professional audiences and users who research before purchasing. YouTube demands higher content production quality but offers evergreen visibility and SEO benefits.
Content production capacity significantly influences platform choice. TikTok requires rapid content creation, trend adaptation, and frequent posting schedules that can strain small teams. YouTube allows for less frequent posting but demands higher production values, scripting, and editing capabilities. Consider your team's skills, equipment, and time availability when choosing platforms.
Hybrid strategies work best for many businesses. Create educational content for YouTube while repurposing highlights and behind-the-scenes content for TikTok. This approach maximizes reach while optimizing content investment across both platforms' unique strengths and audience behaviors.
When in doubt about what to post, we've got your back.
Conclusion
TikTok currently offers lower customer acquisition costs and higher engagement rates, making it ideal for impulse purchases and trend-driven products targeting younger demographics.
YouTube provides superior long-term value through higher conversion rates, better external traffic generation, and more sophisticated monetization options, particularly for educational content and high-consideration purchases.
Sources
- Shopify - Customer Acquisition Cost by Industry
- Lebesgue - TikTok Ads Benchmarks
- Click Analytic - TikTok Engagement Rate Guide
- Adam Connell - YouTube Shorts Statistics
- Zebracat - YouTube Affiliate Marketing Statistics
- Sprout Social - Social Media Demographics
- AMZ Scout - TikTok Shop Statistics
- Single Grain - B2B TikTok Lead Generation
- Influencer Marketing Hub - TikTok vs YouTube
- Vidico - Short Form Video Statistics
Read more articles
-Creator Fund: TikTok vs Instagram Comparison
-How Much Time to Invest in TikTok for Money
-Making Money on TikTok Today: Complete Guide

Who is the author of this content?
NAPOLIFY
A team specialized in data-driven growth strategies for social mediaWe offer data-driven, battle-tested approach to growing online profiles, especially on platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook. Unlike traditional agencies or consultants who often recycle generic advice,we go on the field and we keep analyzing real-world social content—breaking down hundreds of viral posts to identify what formats, hooks, and strategies actually drive engagement, conversions, and growth. If you'd like to learn more about us, you can check our website.
How this content was created 🔎📝
At Napolify, we analyze social media trends and viral content every day. Our team doesn't just observe from a distance—we're actively studying platform-specific patterns, breaking down viral posts, and maintaining a constantly updated database of trends, tactics, and strategies. This hands-on approach allows us to understand what actually drives engagement and growth.
These observations are originally based on what we've learned through analyzing hundreds of viral posts and real-world performance data. But it was not enough. To back them up, we also needed to rely on trusted resources and case studies from major brands.
We prioritize accuracy and authority. Trends lacking solid data or performance metrics were excluded.
Trustworthiness is central to our work. Every source and citation is clearly listed, ensuring transparency. A writing AI-powered tool was used solely to refine readability and engagement.
To make the information accessible, our team designed custom infographics that clarify key points. We hope you will like them! All illustrations and media were created in-house and added manually.