Today, do you get a better CAC on Instagram or on Snapchat?

This article has been written by our Instagram expert who will tell you what are the most efficient strategies in your niche

Calculate
your CAC

A free tool we have made so you can calculate your target Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC).

CALCULATE

What's the average CAC on Instagram versus Snapchat for similar budgets and audiences?

Instagram delivers lower Customer Acquisition Costs for most verticals, with fashion brands achieving $10-$15 CAC compared to Snapchat's $8-$12 range for Gen Z targeting.

The cost differential stems from Instagram's broader user base and more mature advertising infrastructure. Instagram's 2 billion monthly active users provide extensive targeting options, allowing for more granular audience segmentation that can reduce wasted ad spend. However, this advantage diminishes when targeting specific demographics like Gen Z, where Snapchat's concentrated user base becomes more cost-efficient.

Geographic variations significantly impact CAC performance. In India, Snapchat demonstrates 20-30% lower CAC than Instagram due to less competition and higher engagement rates among younger demographics. Conversely, in mature markets like the United States and Western Europe, Instagram's established ecosystem often provides better CAC efficiency for broader audience targeting.

Budget size also influences CAC optimization. Campaigns under $5,000 monthly often see better performance on Snapchat due to lower minimum spend requirements and less algorithmic complexity. Larger budgets exceeding $20,000 monthly typically achieve better CAC on Instagram through advanced optimization features and broader inventory availability.

If you're struggling to identify what content works in your niche, we can help you figure it out.

How do engagement rates compare between platforms across different niches and account sizes?

Snapchat consistently outperforms Instagram in engagement rates across virtually every niche, with an average rate of 0.94% compared to Instagram's declining 0.50% in 2025.

Niche	Instagram Performance	Snapchat Performance
Fashion	1.5-3.5% for catalog sales, declining organic reach	70% increased purchase intent with AR try-ons
Fitness	2.31% for sports content, heavy competition	46% user engagement, less saturated market
Gaming	49% increase in video engagement through Reels	30M+ active game players, highly engaged audience
Beauty	79% of purchases driven by Reels content	100M+ daily AR lens try-ons, immersive experience
Food & Lifestyle	Moderate engagement, algorithm favors video content	High story completion rates, ephemeral content advantage
Technology	Lower engagement, professional content performs better	Strong performance with younger tech adopters
Education	Educational carousels perform well, longer content	Quick tips and visual learning content succeeds

What are the current cost-per-click and cost-per-impression differences?

Instagram maintains a 23% CPC advantage over Snapchat, with current rates at $0.69 versus $0.90 respectively, while CPM rates remain nearly identical.

The CPC gap reflects Instagram's auction maturity and inventory depth. Instagram's algorithm has refined bidding mechanisms over years of operation, creating more competitive pricing for advertisers. Additionally, Instagram's integration with Meta's advertising ecosystem provides cross-platform optimization benefits that naturally drive down costs.

CPM rates show minimal difference at $8.16 for Instagram and $8.39 for Snapchat, indicating similar impression costs. This parity suggests that the platforms compete effectively for advertiser attention at the impression level, but Instagram's superior click-through optimization creates the CPC advantage.

Industry-specific variations reveal important nuances. E-commerce brands often see Instagram CPCs drop to $0.45-$0.55 due to shopping integration features, while B2B companies may experience higher CPCs of $1.20-$1.50. Snapchat shows less variation across industries, maintaining relatively consistent pricing regardless of vertical.

Not sure why your posts aren't converting? Let us take a look for you.

How do conversion rates differ for sales, leads, and app installs?

Instagram demonstrates superior conversion performance for direct sales at 1-3.5%, while Snapchat excels in app install campaigns with stronger post-install engagement metrics.

Direct sales conversion rates favor Instagram significantly, particularly for catalog-driven purchases where integration with shopping features creates seamless user experiences. Fashion and beauty brands report conversion rates between 2.5-3.5% on Instagram compared to 1.8% average on Snapchat. This advantage stems from Instagram's mature shopping infrastructure and user familiarity with in-app purchasing behaviors.

Lead generation shows more balanced performance, with both platforms achieving 1.5-2.5% conversion rates depending on offer quality and targeting precision. However, lead quality metrics often favor Snapchat, with 15-20% higher lead-to-customer conversion rates in subsequent nurturing campaigns, suggesting higher intent among Snapchat-generated leads.

App install campaigns reveal Snapchat's strength in driving quality installs. While Instagram may generate 10-15% more initial installs per dollar spent, Snapchat users demonstrate 30% higher Day 7 retention rates and 25% better in-app purchase behavior, resulting in superior lifetime value metrics for app marketers.

How do audience demographics and purchase intent compare between platforms?

Instagram attracts a more age-diverse audience with 61.1% users aged 18-34, while Snapchat dominates younger demographics with 75% of users aged 13-34 showing higher purchase intent signals.

Geographic distribution reveals distinct market penetration patterns. Instagram leads in emerging markets with 362 million users in India, 170 million in the US, and 135 million in Brazil. Snapchat shows stronger concentration in developed markets, with particularly high penetration in France, the UK, and Australia, where users demonstrate higher disposable income levels.

Purchase intent metrics strongly favor Snapchat users, who complete 40% more purchase actions within 24 hours of ad exposure compared to Instagram users. This behavior pattern reflects Snapchat's ephemeral nature creating urgency, combined with a younger demographic more prone to impulse purchasing decisions.

Income demographics show Instagram users spanning broader economic ranges, making it suitable for both premium and budget-conscious campaigns. Snapchat users skew toward higher disposable income brackets, with 45% of daily active users reporting household incomes above $50,000 annually, compared to 38% on Instagram.

Which content formats perform best on each platform and impact CAC?

Instagram Reels dominate engagement with 45% of total platform interaction time, while Snapchat's AR Lenses achieve 75% daily usage among active users, creating distinct CAC optimization opportunities.

Instagram's Reels format delivers the strongest CAC performance, with video content generating 49% more engagement than static posts. Shopping-integrated Reels particularly excel, driving 79% of purchase decisions among beauty brands. Stories maintain relevance for retargeting campaigns, achieving 20% lower CAC than feed posts when targeting previous website visitors.

Snapchat's AR Lenses represent the platform's most powerful CAC optimization tool, especially for fashion and beauty brands reporting 70% increased purchase intent after AR interactions. Traditional Snap Ads perform adequately but lack the engagement depth of AR experiences. Story Ads excel for broad awareness campaigns but require creative optimization to maintain cost efficiency.

Cross-format performance analysis reveals that brands utilizing platform-native formats achieve 25-40% better CAC than those repurposing content across platforms. Instagram carousel ads work effectively for product catalogs, while Snapchat's Collection Ads better suit immersive brand storytelling approaches.

If you feel like your content isn't getting enough engagement, we can help improve that.

What are the fake engagement and ad fraud risks on each platform?

Instagram faces significantly higher ad fraud risks with 76% fake traffic during major events, while Snapchat maintains better traffic quality with only 11.3% invalid click risk.

Instagram's fraud challenges stem from its massive scale and bot accessibility. During high-traffic events like product launches or viral moments, fraudulent engagement spikes dramatically, inflating metrics and wasting ad spend. This problem particularly affects influencer collaborations and trending hashtag campaigns where automated engagement appears most prevalent.

Snapchat's ephemeral nature and technical architecture create natural barriers against fraud. The platform's emphasis on camera-first content and AR interactions makes automation more difficult for bad actors. Additionally, Snapchat's smaller, more engaged user base reduces the incentive for large-scale fraud operations compared to Instagram's broader reach.

Fraud detection and prevention tools work more effectively on Snapchat due to clearer user behavior patterns. Instagram's diverse content types and engagement methods create more opportunities for sophisticated fraud schemes to blend with legitimate activity, requiring more complex detection systems that sometimes generate false positives.

Which platform delivers better retargeting and retention campaign performance?

Instagram excels in retargeting efficiency with 43% higher conversion rates for returning users, while Snapchat struggles with attribution beyond initial touchpoints but maintains stronger user loyalty.

Instagram's retargeting capabilities benefit from Meta's extensive data ecosystem, enabling precise audience reconstruction and lookalike modeling. Website visitors who engage with Instagram retargeting ads convert at rates 40-50% higher than cold audiences, with particular strength in abandoned cart recovery campaigns achieving 15-25% conversion rates.

Snapchat's retention marketing faces attribution challenges due to privacy-first design principles, making it difficult to track user journeys across multiple touchpoints. However, users who do engage with Snapchat retargeting campaigns demonstrate 30% higher lifetime value due to the platform's ability to create deeper emotional connections through personalized AR experiences.

Campaign sequencing strategies work differently across platforms. Instagram supports sophisticated funnel approaches with awareness, consideration, and conversion campaigns flowing seamlessly. Snapchat requires more creative approaches, using AR engagement as a proxy for purchase intent and building retention through exclusive content access rather than traditional remarketing lists.

How have CAC and conversion metrics evolved from 2024 to 2025?

Instagram's CPM increased 15% year-over-year while engagement rates declined 28%, creating upward pressure on CAC, whereas Snapchat achieved 30% ad revenue growth in key markets with stable engagement metrics.

The Instagram metric deterioration reflects platform saturation and algorithm changes prioritizing paid content over organic reach. Brands report needing 35-50% larger budgets to achieve similar reach levels compared to 2024, forcing many to reconsider their Instagram investment strategies or shift toward more cost-effective content formats.

Snapchat's positive trajectory stems from successful expansion in international markets, particularly India and Southeast Asia, where competition remains lower and user engagement stays high. The platform's focus on AR innovation has attracted premium brand partnerships, driving up average revenue per user without significantly impacting advertiser costs.

Conversion rate trends show diverging patterns. Instagram conversion rates remained stable at 1-2% for most verticals, but the higher costs mean actual CAC increased 20-30% across industries. Snapchat maintained conversion performance while reducing effective CAC through improved targeting algorithms and expanding inventory.

What does the complete conversion funnel look like on each platform?

Instagram's funnel shows strong top-of-funnel reach but experiences 70% drop-off at the conversion stage, while Snapchat maintains higher engagement throughout but struggles with lower initial reach.

Instagram's funnel progression typically follows: 100% reach → 8-12% engagement → 3-5% click-through → 1-2% conversion. The major drop-off occurs between engagement and click-through, where users interact with content but don't proceed to take action. This pattern suggests content quality issues or misaligned call-to-action strategies requiring optimization.

Snapchat demonstrates different funnel characteristics: 100% reach → 15-20% engagement → 6-8% click-through → 1.8% conversion. The platform maintains higher engagement rates throughout the funnel, with smaller drop-offs between stages. However, the initial reach limitations mean fewer total conversions despite better percentage performance.

Funnel optimization strategies differ significantly between platforms. Instagram requires heavy focus on creative testing and audience refinement to improve click-through rates. Snapchat benefits more from AR experience optimization and leveraging ephemeral content urgency to maintain momentum through the conversion process.

When in doubt about what to post, we've got your back.

Where does each platform clearly outperform the other?

Instagram dominates direct sales conversion and broad demographic targeting, while Snapchat excels in Gen Z engagement and AR-driven experiences that create emotional brand connections.

Instagram's clear advantages include shopping integration capabilities that seamlessly connect discovery to purchase, making it essential for e-commerce brands. The platform's mature advertising ecosystem provides sophisticated targeting options and measurement tools that larger enterprises require for complex campaigns. Additionally, Instagram's cross-platform synergy with Facebook expands reach and optimization possibilities unavailable elsewhere.

Snapchat's superiority emerges in authentic youth engagement and innovative brand experiences. The platform's AR capabilities enable product try-ons and immersive experiences that drive significantly higher purchase intent among younger demographics. Snapchat also maintains authenticity advantages, with users perceiving content as more genuine and less commercial compared to Instagram's increasingly polished aesthetic.

Geographic performance varies significantly. Instagram performs better in emerging markets with diverse economic segments, while Snapchat excels in developed markets with higher smartphone penetration and disposable income levels. This geographic split influences platform selection based on expansion strategies and target market maturity.

How should businesses choose between Instagram and Snapchat in 2025?

Choose Instagram for e-commerce sales, diverse age targeting, and established conversion funnels; select Snapchat for Gen Z campaigns, AR experiences, and authentic brand engagement with higher-intent audiences.

Budget allocation frameworks depend on business objectives and target demographics. Brands targeting users over 25 with complex purchase decisions should prioritize Instagram for its superior targeting capabilities and conversion tracking. Companies focusing on impulsive purchase categories like fashion, beauty, or entertainment should consider Snapchat for its engagement quality and purchase intent signals.

Hybrid strategies often deliver optimal results. Many successful brands use Snapchat for awareness and initial engagement, then retarget interested users on Instagram for conversion. This approach leverages Snapchat's engagement advantages while capitalizing on Instagram's conversion infrastructure, creating complementary rather than competitive platform relationships.

Industry-specific recommendations include prioritizing Instagram for B2B, luxury goods, and complex sales cycles, while emphasizing Snapchat for consumer goods, entertainment, and impulse purchases. Technology companies benefit from Instagram's professional context, while lifestyle brands thrive on Snapchat's authentic, personal environment.

If you're unsure why your audience isn't growing, let's take a look together.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Gupta Media - Instagram Ads Cost Insights
2. Gupta Media - Social Media Ads Cost Analysis
3. Gupta Media - Snapchat Ads Cost Guide
4. LeadsBridge - Advertising Cost Analysis
5. Social Insider - Instagram Benchmarks
6. Sprout Social - Instagram Statistics
7. Shopify - Social Media Conversion Rates
8. Sprout Social - Snapchat Statistics
9. The Media Ant - Snapchat Marketing Guide
10. CHEQ - Snapchat Click Fraud Analysis

Who is the author of this content?

NAPOLIFY

A team specialized in data-driven growth strategies for social media

We offer data-driven, battle-tested approach to growing online profiles, especially on platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook. Unlike traditional agencies or consultants who often recycle generic advice,we go on the field and we keep analyzing real-world social content—breaking down hundreds of viral posts to identify what formats, hooks, and strategies actually drive engagement, conversions, and growth. If you'd like to learn more about us, you can check our website.

How this content was created 🔎📝

At Napolify, we analyze social media trends and viral content every day. Our team doesn't just observe from a distance—we're actively studying platform-specific patterns, breaking down viral posts, and maintaining a constantly updated database of trends, tactics, and strategies. This hands-on approach allows us to understand what actually drives engagement and growth.

These observations are originally based on what we've learned through analyzing hundreds of viral posts and real-world performance data. But it was not enough. To back them up, we also needed to rely on trusted resources and case studies from major brands.

We prioritize accuracy and authority. Trends lacking solid data or performance metrics were excluded.

Trustworthiness is central to our work. Every source and citation is clearly listed, ensuring transparency. A writing AI-powered tool was used solely to refine readability and engagement.

To make the information accessible, our team designed custom infographics that clarify key points. We hope you will like them! All illustrations and media were created in-house and added manually.