Today, do you get a better CAC on Instagram or on LinkedIn?
This article has been written by our social media expert who will tell you what are the most efficient strategies in your niche

We will tell you what works for your niche on social media
Choosing between Instagram and LinkedIn for customer acquisition depends entirely on your target audience and business model.
While Instagram dominates B2C markets with lower costs and higher engagement volume, LinkedIn commands premium prices for B2B leads that convert at higher values. The real question isn't which platform is cheaper, but which delivers better ROI for your specific goals.
And if you need help with your social media, our team can take a look and help you grow more efficiently.
Calculate
your CAC
A free tool we have made so you can calculate your target Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC).
CALCULATESummary
Instagram offers B2C brands customer acquisition costs between $53-$91 with engagement rates averaging 0.5%, while LinkedIn commands $982 per B2B customer but delivers higher-quality leads. Content strategy differs dramatically: Instagram thrives on Reels and carousels reaching younger audiences, while LinkedIn's professional audience engages 10x more with value-driven carousels and native video.
Metric | ||
---|---|---|
Average CAC | $53-$91 (B2C) $230 (paid social avg) |
$982 (B2B) Highest among social channels |
Engagement Rate | 0.5% overall 2-8% for nano-influencers |
5-6.5% average 6.6% for carousels |
Ad CPM | $5-$15 Stable in 2025 |
$33-$65 for B2B Rising due to competition |
Best Content | Reels (1.23% ER) Carousels (0.55% ER) |
PDF Carousels (6.6% ER) Native Video (5.6% ER) |
Demographics | 60% under 35 31.7% aged 18-24 |
50.6% aged 25-34 High-income professionals |
Fake Followers | 10-30% risk Higher on large accounts |
Less common but rising 45% engagement drop if fake |
Monthly Ad Spend | $300-$5,000 Lower entry barrier |
$734-$1,000+ Higher minimum investment |
What's the real cost difference between Instagram and LinkedIn customer acquisition?
Instagram delivers B2C customers at $53-$91 each, while LinkedIn B2B acquisition costs average $982 per customer.
The cost gap reflects fundamental differences in audience value and buying power. Instagram's younger demographic makes impulse purchases averaging $50-$200, while LinkedIn's professional audience commits to $5,000-$50,000 B2B contracts. Your paid social budget determines platform choice: Instagram campaigns start at $300 monthly, while LinkedIn demands $734+ for meaningful results.
Industry matters tremendously for CAC optimization. Fashion brands on Instagram achieve $53 CAC through influencer partnerships and user-generated content. SaaS companies on LinkedIn justify $982 CAC because their average customer lifetime value exceeds $25,000. The platform you choose should align with your average order value and sales cycle length.
Hidden costs impact true CAC calculations. Instagram's 10-30% fake follower rates inflate engagement metrics and distort conversion tracking. LinkedIn's sophisticated targeting options cost more upfront but reduce wasted impressions on unqualified leads. Factor in content creation costs: Instagram requires constant fresh visuals, while LinkedIn rewards evergreen thought leadership content.
If you're struggling to identify what content works in your niche, we can help you figure it out.
How do engagement rates actually compare between platforms and influencer tiers?
LinkedIn's average 5-6.5% engagement rate crushes Instagram's 0.5% overall rate, but the comparison requires context.
Instagram engagement varies dramatically by account size and content type. Nano-influencers (1K-10K followers) achieve 2-8% engagement through authentic connections with their audience. Mega-influencers see rates drop to 0.9-1.9% as follower counts exceed 500K. Reels generate 1.23% engagement and double the impressions of static posts, while carousels earn the most saves at 0.55% engagement.
Account Type | Instagram Engagement | Strategic Implications |
---|---|---|
Nano (1K-10K) | 2.2%-4% average Up to 8% for niche content |
Partner with 10+ nano creators instead of one macro influencer for better ROI |
Micro (10K-50K) | 1.0%-3.1% average Sweet spot for cost/reach |
Ideal for product launches; negotiate 3-6 month partnerships for consistency |
Macro (50K-500K) | 0.8%-2.4% average Broader reach, lower rate |
Use for brand awareness campaigns; require performance guarantees in contracts |
Mega (500K+) | 0.9%-1.9% average Celebrity status pricing |
Reserve for major launches; combine with paid amplification for impact |
LinkedIn (All) | 5.0%-6.5% median Professional context |
Focus on thought leadership; post Tuesday-Thursday 8-10 AM for peak engagement |
Content Format Impact | Reels: 1.23% Carousels: 0.55% Images: 0.45% |
Prioritize video for reach; use carousels for education and saves |
Posting Frequency | Daily posts decrease engagement 15% 3-4x weekly optimal |
Quality over quantity; batch content creation for consistency |
LinkedIn's higher engagement stems from professional intent and algorithm preferences. Multi-image posts achieve 6.6% engagement, while native documents and polls drive meaningful conversations. The platform rewards value-driven content that sparks discussion among decision-makers.
Not sure why your posts aren't converting? Let us take a look for you.
What conversion rates should you expect from social media to sale?
Both platforms deliver similar 1-3% purchase conversion rates, but the path to purchase differs significantly.
Instagram's conversion funnel moves faster but requires more touchpoints. Average ad click-through rates reach 1.1-2%, beating LinkedIn's 0.5-1%. Landing page conversion rates average 4.3-6.6% across industries on both platforms. The critical difference lies in purchase intent: Instagram users browse casually and convert impulsively, while LinkedIn users research thoroughly before committing to higher-value purchases.
Conversion optimization tactics vary by platform. Instagram benefits from shoppable posts, influencer discount codes, and limited-time offers that create urgency. Stories with swipe-up links (now link stickers) convert 15-25% better than bio links. User-generated content increases conversion rates by 4.5% by providing social proof at the consideration stage.
LinkedIn conversions require nurturing through longer sales cycles. Lead generation forms built into the platform convert at 10-15% versus 2-3% for external landing pages. Gated content like whitepapers and webinars captures high-intent leads worth the higher acquisition cost. Follow-up sequences spanning 3-6 months are standard for B2B conversions.
Track micro-conversions to optimize the full funnel. Instagram saves indicate purchase intent and predict future conversions. LinkedIn post reactions and profile views signal early-stage interest. Both platforms reward retargeting: Instagram users who engage with three or more posts convert 2.7x better, while LinkedIn InMail to warm leads achieves 3x higher response rates.
How does audience intent affect your marketing strategy on each platform?
Instagram users seek inspiration and entertainment, while LinkedIn users pursue professional solutions and networking opportunities.
This intent gap fundamentally shapes content strategy and conversion expectations. Instagram's discovery-driven audience responds to aspirational lifestyle content, behind-the-scenes glimpses, and trend-driven posts. The platform excels at creating desire for products users didn't know they wanted. Successful brands leverage FOMO, social proof, and visual storytelling to move users from awareness to purchase within days or hours.
LinkedIn's goal-oriented users arrive with specific business challenges. They value expertise, data-driven insights, and peer recommendations. Content that demonstrates ROI, shares case studies, or provides actionable frameworks outperforms promotional material. The average LinkedIn user spends 17 minutes monthly on the platform with clear professional objectives, versus Instagram's 53 minutes of casual browsing.
Purchase behavior reflects these intent differences. Instagram drives impulse purchases under $200, with 70% of users reporting discovery of new products on the platform. LinkedIn influences considered purchases averaging $5,000-$50,000, with 80% of B2B leads from social media originating there. Decision-making involves multiple stakeholders, longer evaluation periods, and emphasis on vendor credibility.
Adapt your funnel to match platform intent. Instagram funnels should minimize friction with single-click purchases, social login options, and mobile-optimized checkout. LinkedIn funnels benefit from educational touchpoints, free trials, and consultative selling approaches. The quality versus quantity trade-off is real: one LinkedIn lead often equals the value of 50-100 Instagram leads.
Which content formats deliver the best engagement on each platform?
Instagram Reels generate 2x more reach than other formats, while LinkedIn carousels achieve 6.6% engagement rates.
Content Type | Instagram Performance | LinkedIn Performance |
---|---|---|
Video/Reels | 1.23% engagement 2x reach of images 67% of users watch daily |
5.6% engagement for native video 3x more comments than images Videos under 30 seconds perform best |
Carousels | 0.55% engagement Most saved format 1.5x more reach than single images |
6.6% engagement (highest) PDF carousels drive 3x more clicks 10-15 slides optimal |
Single Images | 0.45% engagement Declining reach since 2023 Best for brand consistency |
4.2% engagement Professional headshots 2x better Infographics outperform photos |
Stories/Polls | 500M daily users 15-25% swipe-up rate Expires in 24 hours |
Polls: 2.5x more engagement Great for market research Professional insights preferred |
Live Content | 3x longer watch time 6x more engagement Shopping integration available |
LinkedIn Live: 7x more reactions 24x more comments Requires application approval |
Text Posts | Not applicable Caption limits 2,200 chars First 125 chars critical |
1,300 character posts optimal 3-5 paragraphs ideal Questions increase comments 50% |
User Generated | 4.5% higher conversion 56% more engagement Builds authentic trust |
Employee advocacy 8x reach Customer testimonials key Case studies drive leads |
Platform algorithms heavily favor native content formats. Instagram's algorithm prioritizes Reels to compete with TikTok, giving them 3.5x more reach than traditional posts. LinkedIn rewards "dwell time" content like carousels and documents that keep users engaged longer on the platform.
If you feel like your content isn't getting enough engagement, we can help improve that.
Who exactly uses each platform and why does it matter?
Instagram's 2 billion users skew young and lifestyle-focused, while LinkedIn's 1 billion members are career-driven professionals.
Age demographics shape purchasing power and content preferences. Instagram's core audience is 31.7% aged 18-24 and 30.3% aged 25-34, with spending focused on fashion, beauty, fitness, and entertainment. Gen Z users spend 4.5 hours daily on social media, with Instagram capturing 32% of that time. Their average transaction value is $50-$150, but lifetime value grows as income increases with age.
LinkedIn's professional demographic commands higher income and decision-making authority. The platform's largest cohort (50.6%) is aged 25-34, prime career-building years with rising disposable income. C-suite executives are 5x more active on LinkedIn than other platforms. Average user income exceeds $75,000, with 45% holding bachelor's degrees or higher.
Geographic and cultural differences impact strategy. Instagram dominates in visual-first markets like fashion capitals and tourist destinations. LinkedIn thrives in business hubs and tech centers. Time zone considerations matter: Instagram engagement peaks evenings and weekends, while LinkedIn sees highest activity Tuesday through Thursday during business hours.
Gender balance affects content approach. Instagram maintains near-perfect gender parity with slight female skew (51.8%), driving success for beauty, wellness, and lifestyle brands. LinkedIn leans male (56.4%), particularly in tech and finance sectors. However, female LinkedIn engagement rates exceed male rates by 26%, making women influential despite smaller numbers.
How much should fake followers concern your ROI calculations?
Fake followers inflate Instagram metrics by 10-30% and increasingly plague LinkedIn, directly impacting your true CAC.
Instagram's bot problem is well-documented but evolving. Sophisticated bot networks now mimic human behavior with gradual following patterns, realistic profile photos, and even automated comments using GPT technology. Accounts over 100K followers average 16% fake followers, while micro-influencers maintain cleaner audiences around 8% fake. Each fake follower represents wasted ad spend and skewed analytics that compound over time.
Detection methods have improved but require vigilance. Sudden follower spikes, generic comments, and engagement rates below 0.5% signal bot infiltration. Tools like HypeAuditor and Modash provide detailed audits, but manual checks remain essential. Look for follower-to-following ratios exceeding 10:1, profile photos that reverse image search to stock sites, and comment patterns that repeat across posts.
LinkedIn's fake profile surge threatens B2B marketing integrity. Fake profiles have increased 65% since 2023, often posing as recruiters or senior executives to appear legitimate. These profiles corrupt lead quality metrics and Sales Navigator targeting. Companies report 15-25% of LinkedIn leads being fake or extremely low quality, forcing investment in verification processes.
Combat fake engagement through platform-specific strategies. Instagram's algorithm update in 2025 prioritizes "meaningful interactions" from verified accounts, naturally suppressing bot engagement. LinkedIn's verification system and SSI (Social Selling Index) help identify genuine professionals. Budget 10-15% extra for audience cleaning and verification tools to maintain accurate CAC calculations.
What's the typical monthly ad spend comparison between platforms?
Instagram campaigns start at $300 monthly, while LinkedIn demands $734+ for meaningful results.
- Instagram small business budget ($300-$500/month): Reaches 10,000-50,000 users monthly with targeted demographics. Best for local businesses, e-commerce startups, and service providers testing market fit. Allows 10-15 ad variations for A/B testing. Generates 50-200 leads depending on industry and targeting precision.
- Instagram growth budget ($1,000-$5,000/month): Scales reach to 200,000-1M impressions monthly. Enables retargeting campaigns, influencer partnerships, and multi-format testing. Supports 3-5 concurrent campaigns targeting different funnel stages. Typical for established e-commerce brands and growing SaaS companies.
- LinkedIn starter budget ($734-$1,000/month): Minimum viable budget for B2B lead generation. Reaches 5,000-15,000 decision-makers with precise job title targeting. Generates 10-30 high-quality leads monthly in most industries. Requires patience for optimization given higher costs.
- LinkedIn scale budget ($2,500-$10,000/month): Enables account-based marketing to target specific companies. Supports InMail campaigns, sponsored content, and dynamic ads simultaneously. Reaches 50,000-200,000 professionals monthly. Standard for B2B companies with sales teams ready for lead volume.
- Budget allocation strategies: Instagram rewards 70/30 split between prospecting and retargeting. LinkedIn benefits from 60/40 split between content promotion and direct response. Both platforms require 20% budget reserve for testing new formats and audiences. Creative production costs add 15-30% to media spend.
Platform-specific optimizations stretch budgets further. Instagram's Advantage+ campaigns use AI to find converting audiences at 23% lower cost. LinkedIn's audience expansion features increase reach by 30% while maintaining lead quality. Both platforms reward consistent spending with better rates and improved delivery.
What are the real performance metrics for paid campaigns in 2025?
Instagram delivers CPMs of $5-$15 and CTRs of 1.1-2%, while LinkedIn CPMs reach $33-$65 with CTRs of 0.5-1%.
These metrics tell only part of the story. Instagram's lower CPMs translate to broader reach for brand awareness campaigns. Fashion brands achieve $5 CPMs targeting broad demographics, while luxury goods requiring income targeting see $15+ CPMs. Click-through rates vary dramatically by format: collection ads achieve 2.5% CTR, while standard image ads hover around 0.9%.
LinkedIn's premium pricing reflects audience quality rather than platform greed. B2B technology companies report $98-$350 cost per lead, but average deal sizes of $25,000-$100,000 justify the investment. Financial services see even higher CPLs at $200-$500, offset by lifetime values exceeding $250,000. The platform's lead gen forms convert at 10-15%, far exceeding typical landing page rates.
Return on ad spend (ROAS) requires different measurement windows. Instagram typically delivers 2-6x ROAS within 7-28 days for e-commerce. LinkedIn's B2B focus means 3-6x ROAS measured over 3-12 months. The platforms serve different purposes: Instagram drives immediate revenue, while LinkedIn builds pipeline value.
Year-over-year changes demand strategy adjustments. Instagram CPMs remained stable in 2025 but engagement dropped 15% as users suffer content fatigue. LinkedIn costs increased 18% as more B2B marketers compete for finite professional attention. Smart marketers are shifting budget to underutilized formats: Instagram Reels ads and LinkedIn conversation ads show 30% better efficiency than traditional placements.
Which industries win on each platform based on real data?
B2C brands dominate Instagram with fashion achieving $53 CAC, while B2B SaaS thrives on LinkedIn despite $982 CAC.
Industry | Instagram Performance | LinkedIn Performance |
---|---|---|
Fashion/Beauty | $53 CAC, 2.8% conversion Influencer partnerships drive 60% of sales User-generated content critical |
Limited success except B2B suppliers Corporate fashion performs moderately Better for recruiting than sales |
SaaS/Technology | High CAC ($200+), low relevance Works for consumer apps only Better for employer branding |
$982 CAC but $25K+ LTV 6-month sales cycles standard Demo requests convert at 20% |
Food/Beverage | $61 CAC, visual platform ideal Local targeting highly effective Stories drive foot traffic |
B2B food service succeeds Corporate catering leads quality Trade marketing opportunities |
Professional Services | Limited except creative agencies Personal brands can succeed Educational content helps |
$500-$1,500 CAC justified Thought leadership essential Referrals amplify ROI |
E-commerce/Retail | $73 CAC, shopping features excel 45% discover products here Checkout integration boosts sales |
B2B suppliers and wholesale Enterprise retail tech Supply chain connections |
Fitness/Wellness | $84 CAC, transformation content Micro-influencers drive trust Community building critical |
Corporate wellness programs B2B fitness solutions Executive health services |
Financial Services | Regulatory limits, younger demographic challenges Fintech apps gaining traction Educational content required |
$200-$500 CPL but high LTV Decision-maker direct access Trust and credibility platform |
Success factors transcend simple industry categorization. Instagram rewards brands with strong visual identities, compelling storytelling, and community engagement. LinkedIn favors companies solving expensive business problems with clear ROI demonstration. The sweet spot exists for brands operating in both spaces: B2C companies with B2B components or B2B brands with consumer appeal.
When in doubt about what to post, we've got your back.
Where do users drop off in the platform-specific conversion funnels?
Instagram loses 73% of users between engagement and profile click, while LinkedIn's main drop-off occurs during lead qualification.
Instagram's visual-first nature creates unique funnel challenges. Users engage with content (like, save, share) but only 27% click through to profiles. Of those reaching profiles, just 15% click the bio link. The platform's design prioritizes in-app engagement over external traffic. Stories perform better with 15-25% swipe-up rates, but only for accounts over 10K followers or verified badges.
Critical Instagram optimization points include bio link strategy (link-in-bio tools increase clicks 23%), shoppable posts (reduce steps to purchase by 50%), and story highlights (extend content lifespan and improve discovery). The biggest missed opportunity is retargeting engaged users who never clicked through - these warm audiences convert 3x better than cold traffic.
LinkedIn's funnel reflects longer B2B cycles and multiple stakeholders. Initial engagement rates of 5-6% drop to 0.5-1% click-through rates as users consume content without immediate action intent. Lead forms capture 10-15% of clicks, but only 20-30% of leads qualify as sales-ready. The 3-6 month nurture requirement tests marketing patience and budget.
Platform-specific solutions address these drop-offs. Instagram benefits from user-generated content campaigns that keep buyers in-app longer. LinkedIn succeeds with multi-touch campaigns combining organic thought leadership, targeted ads, and sales navigator outreach. Both platforms reward persistent, value-first approaches over aggressive sales tactics.
How should you adapt strategy for 2026's expected platform changes?
AI-powered algorithms will prioritize entertainment on Instagram and thought leadership on LinkedIn, demanding strategic content shifts.
- Instagram's AI evolution: The platform's recommendation engine now powers 50% of feed content from non-followed accounts. By 2026, this reaches 70%, making viral potential more important than follower count. Brands must create entertainment-first content that competes with creators, not just competitors. Short-form video dominates, with Reels expected to comprise 75% of engagement.
- LinkedIn's professional content surge: AI curation favors expertise demonstration and valuable insights over promotional content. The platform's "creator mode" expansion means every professional becomes a potential competitor for attention. Companies must empower employees as brand ambassadors and invest in executive thought leadership. Video content on LinkedIn will grow 5x by 2026.
- Cost implications: Instagram CPMs remain stable but require higher creative investment to break through. Budget 30% more for content production, particularly video. LinkedIn CPMs increase 15-20% annually as B2B competition intensifies. Smart money shifts to underutilized formats before saturation hits.
- Behavioral shifts: Both platforms see users demanding authentic, valuable content over polished marketing. Instagram users spend more time in DMs and broadcast channels, requiring community management investment. LinkedIn users engage more with personal profiles than company pages, necessitating employee advocacy programs.
- Strategic adaptations: Success requires platform-native thinking. Instagram strategies must embrace entertainment, trends, and cultural moments. LinkedIn demands consistent value delivery and relationship building. Both platforms reward consistency - algorithms favor regular posters over sporadic campaigns. Plan 90-day content calendars and batch production for efficiency.
The convergence trend continues as platforms copy successful features. Instagram's professional tools and LinkedIn's creator focus blur traditional boundaries. Brands succeeding in 2026 will excel at platform-specific content while maintaining consistent brand narratives across channels.
Conclusion
The Instagram versus LinkedIn CAC debate misses the larger point: success depends on alignment between platform strengths and business models. Instagram excels at high-volume, lower-value B2C transactions with visual appeal, while LinkedIn justifies premium costs through access to decision-makers and longer-term B2B relationships.
Smart marketers in 2025 aren't choosing between platforms but optimizing presence on both with tailored strategies. Your next step is auditing current performance against these benchmarks and reallocating budget to platform-specific content formats that drive results. The data is clear - success requires more than presence; it demands platform-native excellence.
Sources
- UserMaven - Average Customer Acquisition Cost
- First Page Sage - CAC by Channel
- Popular Pays - Instagram Engagement Rates 2025
- Social Insider - LinkedIn Benchmarks
- Unbounce - Landing Page Conversion Rates
- Sprout Social - Social Media Demographics
- Influencer Marketing Hub - Fake Follower Analysis
- Agency Analytics - Average Ad Spend by Platform
- Topmost Ads - LinkedIn CPM Analysis
- Column Content - LinkedIn Statistics
Read more articles
-How the Current Instagram Algorithm Works
-Instagram vs Snapchat: Which Platform Has Better CAC?
-Instagram vs Facebook: CAC Comparison Guide
-Instagram vs Threads: Customer Acquisition Analysis
-Instagram vs YouTube: Which Delivers Better CAC?
-Making Money with Instagram Subscriptions
-Instagram Affiliate Marketing Revenue Guide
-How to Earn Money from Instagram Reels
-YouTube vs Instagram Creator Payments Compared

Who is the author of this content?
NAPOLIFY
A team specialized in data-driven growth strategies for social mediaWe offer data-driven, battle-tested approach to growing online profiles, especially on platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook. Unlike traditional agencies or consultants who often recycle generic advice,we go on the field and we keep analyzing real-world social content—breaking down hundreds of viral posts to identify what formats, hooks, and strategies actually drive engagement, conversions, and growth. If you'd like to learn more about us, you can check our website.
How this content was created 🔎📝
At Napolify, we analyze social media trends and viral content every day. Our team doesn't just observe from a distance—we're actively studying platform-specific patterns, breaking down viral posts, and maintaining a constantly updated database of trends, tactics, and strategies. This hands-on approach allows us to understand what actually drives engagement and growth.
These observations are originally based on what we've learned through analyzing hundreds of viral posts and real-world performance data. But it was not enough. To back them up, we also needed to rely on trusted resources and case studies from major brands.
We prioritize accuracy and authority. Trends lacking solid data or performance metrics were excluded.
Trustworthiness is central to our work. Every source and citation is clearly listed, ensuring transparency. A writing AI-powered tool was used solely to refine readability and engagement.
To make the information accessible, our team designed custom infographics that clarify key points. We hope you will like them! All illustrations and media were created in-house and added manually.