Today, do you get a better CAC on TikTok or on Threads?

This article has been written by our TikTok expert who will tell you what are the most efficient strategies in your niche

Calculate
your CAC

A free tool we have made so you can calculate your target Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC).

CALCULATE

What's the average CAC for a direct-to-consumer product on TikTok versus Threads in 2025?

TikTok's D2C CAC ranges from $18.90 to $71.60, with fashion brands seeing costs as high as $157 due to increased competition.

This represents a 53% increase since 2022, driven by rising CPM costs around $3.21 and ad saturation across the platform. The attribution window of 7-day click and 1-day view creates additional challenges for accurate tracking.

Threads currently operates without direct monetization, making CAC calculations impossible through traditional paid advertising. Brands achieve customer acquisition through organic reach and cross-promotion via Instagram, resulting in significantly lower initial costs but requiring substantial time investment.

The trend shows TikTok CAC rising 9.5% year-over-year, while Threads maintains zero advertising costs but with Meta's ad system launching in 2025, expect this landscape to shift dramatically.

If you're struggling to identify what content works in your niche, we can help you figure it out.

How does the audience demographic and buying intent differ between TikTok and Threads?

TikTok dominates the younger demographic with 76% of users under 30, while Threads skews older with 36.4% in the 25-34 age range.

Demographic	TikTok	Threads
Primary Age	18-34 (76% under 30)	25-34 (36.4%)
Gender Split	55% male, 45% female	68% male, 32% female
Buying Behavior	77% discover products, impulse-driven purchases	Community-focused, relationship-building approach
Platform Usage	Entertainment and product discovery	Professional networking and discussions
Purchase Decision	Quick, visual-based decisions	Considered, research-heavy approach
Content Consumption	Passive scrolling, high engagement with video	Active participation in conversations
Brand Interaction	Direct purchasing through TikTok Shop	Link-in-bio funneling to external sites

What are the average engagement rates on TikTok and Threads by niche and account size in 2025?

TikTok engagement rates vary significantly by follower count, with micro-influencers achieving 3.3% while mega-influencers drop to 1.2%.

Follower Range	TikTok Average ER	Threads Average ER	Key Differences
Under 10k	3.3%	8-12% (estimated)	Threads benefits from lower competition
10k-50k	2.1%	5-8% (estimated)	TikTok algorithm favors consistent creators
50k-100k	1.8%	4-6% (estimated)	Both platforms show declining rates with size
100k+	1.2%	2-4% (estimated)	Mega-influencers face engagement dilution
Fashion Niche	1.5-3%	3-5% (estimated)	Visual content performs better on TikTok
Tech/Business	1.8-2.5%	6-10% (estimated)	Threads excels in professional discussions
Lifestyle	2.2-3.8%	4-7% (estimated)	Personal stories resonate on both platforms

What's the average number of likes and comments per post on each platform for creators under 10k, 50k, and 100k followers?

TikTok's engagement numbers show a clear inverse relationship between follower count and engagement percentage, while Threads maintains higher relative engagement across all tiers.

Creators with under 10k followers on TikTok average 330 likes and 15 comments per post, translating to the platform's highest engagement rate of 3.3%. The algorithm actively promotes content from smaller creators to maintain discovery potential.

At the 50k follower mark, TikTok creators see approximately 1,050 likes and 35 comments per post, representing a 2.1% engagement rate. This decrease reflects increased competition for attention within larger audiences.

Creators exceeding 100k followers typically receive 1,200 likes and 40 comments per post, dropping to 1.2% engagement. The diminishing returns highlight the challenge of maintaining intimate connections with massive audiences.

Threads data remains limited due to its relative newness, but early indicators suggest 8-12% engagement rates for accounts under 10k followers, with proportionally higher comment-to-like ratios due to the platform's conversation-focused design.

What is the conversion rate from views to click-through to sale on both platforms, broken down by offer type?

TikTok's conversion funnel shows stronger performance across all offer types, with ecommerce achieving 9.8% conversion rates through TikTok Shop integration.

Offer Type	TikTok Conversion	Threads Conversion	Key Factors
Digital Products	3.2-5.8%	1.1-2.3%	TikTok's impulse-driven environment favors quick decisions
Coaching Services	1.8-3.1%	2.5-4.2%	Threads' trust-building environment benefits high-consideration services
Ecommerce	4.5-9.8%	0.8-1.9%	TikTok Shop enables seamless in-app purchasing
Professional Services	1.2-2.4%	3.1-5.7%	Threads' professional networking atmosphere drives B2B conversions
Subscription Models	2.8-4.3%	1.5-2.8%	TikTok's entertainment value translates to subscription interest
Event Tickets	6.2-8.9%	2.1-3.4%	FOMO marketing excels on TikTok's fast-paced environment
App Downloads	5.1-7.2%	1.8-2.9%	TikTok's mobile-first audience drives app adoption

Which platform shows better performance in terms of watch time or time spent per session for monetization purposes?

TikTok dominates session duration with users spending 55 minutes daily on the platform, compared to Threads' 2.6 minutes per session.

This extended engagement window creates multiple monetization touchpoints throughout a single session. Users typically view 200-300 videos per session, providing numerous opportunities for product placement, sponsored content, and direct sales through TikTok Shop.

The platform's addictive scroll mechanism keeps users in a purchasing-ready mindset, with 22% higher conversion rates during live shopping events compared to static posts. This sustained attention span allows for progressive trust-building and multiple product exposures.

Threads operates on a different engagement model, prioritizing meaningful interactions over extended viewing sessions. While individual sessions are shorter, users return frequently throughout the day for quick check-ins and conversations.

Not sure why your posts aren't converting? Let us take a look for you.

How much fake traffic or bot activity is estimated on both platforms, and how does that affect CAC reliability?

TikTok removed 6 billion fake followers in Q4 2024 alone, indicating approximately 15% bot traffic that significantly distorts CAC calculations.

This bot activity inflates engagement metrics artificially, making cost-per-engagement appear lower than actual human interaction rates. Sophisticated AI-powered bots now mimic human behavior patterns, requiring advanced detection methods beyond traditional metrics.

The platform's rapid growth attracts bot farms seeking to capitalize on viral content opportunities, with fake engagement potentially inflating reach by 20-30% in some niches. This means actual CAC could be 15-25% higher than reported metrics suggest.

Threads faces different challenges, with an 82% user drop-off after initial launch suggesting inflated early adoption statistics. While bot activity appears lower due to Meta's established detection systems, the platform's newness makes long-term reliability assessments difficult.

AI fingerprinting technology now requires implementation across both platforms to identify sophisticated bot networks that traditional metrics miss, affecting the accuracy of CAC calculations for performance marketers.

Which content types are currently performing best on each platform in terms of conversions?

TikTok's live shopping events achieve 22% higher conversion rates than static posts, while pinned conversion videos maintain consistent performance over time.

Short-form product demonstrations under 15 seconds capture attention effectively, with carousel ads featuring user-generated content driving 18% better click-through rates. Spark ads utilizing creator content maintain authenticity while delivering commercial messages.

Threads excels with value-driven text posts that establish expertise and build community trust. Long-form educational content performs particularly well, with users sharing detailed insights about industry trends and professional experiences.

Visual content on Threads focuses on infographics and screenshot-based posts rather than video, with carousel posts featuring multiple insights generating higher engagement than single-image posts.

If you feel like your content isn't getting enough engagement, we can help improve that.

Where do creators report the highest return on ad spend and lifetime value per customer between TikTok and Threads?

TikTok creators report 3.2x ROAS on average, with fashion and beauty brands achieving up to 4.8x returns through strategic influencer partnerships.

Customer lifetime value on TikTok averages $127 for ecommerce customers, driven by the platform's ability to create brand loyalty through entertaining content. Repeat purchase rates reach 34% within 90 days for successfully retargeted customers.

The platform's algorithm promotes content that drives genuine engagement, meaning high-converting posts receive extended organic reach beyond paid promotion periods. This amplification effect can extend campaign ROI for weeks after initial spending.

Threads cannot provide traditional ROAS metrics due to its current organic-only model, but creators building substantial followings report higher customer lifetime values averaging $189 for service-based businesses. The trust-building environment creates stronger client relationships that translate to longer retention periods.

Professional service providers on Threads achieve 67% client retention rates compared to 43% on TikTok, suggesting higher-quality leads despite lower initial volume.

How has the CAC on TikTok and Threads evolved in the past 12 months, and what trends are forecasted for 2026?

TikTok's CAC increased 9.5% year-over-year, with CPM costs rising from $2.87 to $3.21 as advertiser competition intensifies.

This upward trend reflects the platform's maturing advertising ecosystem, where early adopters enjoyed lower costs that are no longer sustainable. Premium placement opportunities now command significantly higher prices, particularly during peak shopping seasons.

Algorithm changes favoring authentic creator content over obvious advertisements have forced brands to invest more in influencer partnerships and native content creation, increasing overall acquisition costs by 15-20% beyond pure media spend.

Threads maintained zero advertising costs throughout 2024 but Meta's announced ad integration for 2025 will likely mirror Instagram's pricing structure initially. Early projections suggest CAC ranges of $8-25 for initial campaigns as the platform tests monetization models.

2026 forecasts predict TikTok CAC stabilization as AI optimization tools improve targeting efficiency, while Threads may experience rapid CAC increases as organic reach diminishes with ad introduction, similar to Facebook's historical pattern.

Where is one platform a clear winner when launching a new brand, and where is the other stronger for scaling an existing one?

TikTok excels for launching new brands targeting consumers under $50 price points, leveraging impulse-driven purchasing behavior and viral discovery potential.

New brands benefit from TikTok's democratic algorithm that can push unknown products to millions of users based on engagement rather than follower count. This creates overnight success opportunities impossible on traditional platforms.

The platform's shopping integration allows immediate monetization without complex funnel setup, making it ideal for testing product-market fit quickly and cost-effectively. User-generated content around new products spreads organically, providing free marketing amplification.

Threads proves superior for scaling established brands in professional services and high-consideration purchases where trust and expertise matter more than viral appeal. The platform's conversation-centric design allows for deeper customer relationship building.

Existing brands with substantial content libraries can repurpose expertise-driven content effectively on Threads, establishing thought leadership that drives long-term customer acquisition without constant content creation demands.

How should someone choose between TikTok and Threads for growth based on their product price point, content bandwidth, and business model?

Choose TikTok if your product costs under $100, you can produce video content consistently, and your business model relies on volume sales with quick decision cycles.

Decision Factor	Choose TikTok When	Choose Threads When
Product Price	Under $100, impulse purchase items	Over $100, high-consideration purchases
Content Capacity	Can produce 3-5 videos weekly	Limited to text/image content
Target Audience	Gen Z and younger millennials	Professionals and older millennials
Business Model	Ecommerce, subscription boxes, entertainment	Consulting, coaching, professional services
Sales Cycle	Quick decisions, impulse purchases	Long consideration periods, relationship-based sales
Marketing Budget	$1,000+ monthly for competitive niches	Limited budget, focusing on organic growth
Brand Stage	New brand seeking rapid awareness	Established brand building thought leadership

Conclusion

Sources

1. LoyaltyLion - Average CAC Ecommerce
2. Focus Digital - Customer Acquisition Cost Amazon
3. Lebesgue - TikTok Ads Benchmarks
4. LinkedIn - Threads Outperforming X
5. Influencer Marketing Factory - TikTok Instagram ER
6. Exploding Topics - TikTok Demographics
7. Sprout Social - Social Media Demographics
8. Search Logistics - Threads Statistics
9. Statista - TikTok Fake Interactions Removed
10. Exploding Topics - Time Spent on TikTok

Who is the author of this content?

NAPOLIFY

A team specialized in data-driven growth strategies for social media

We offer data-driven, battle-tested approach to growing online profiles, especially on platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook. Unlike traditional agencies or consultants who often recycle generic advice,we go on the field and we keep analyzing real-world social content—breaking down hundreds of viral posts to identify what formats, hooks, and strategies actually drive engagement, conversions, and growth. If you'd like to learn more about us, you can check our website.

How this content was created 🔎📝

At Napolify, we analyze social media trends and viral content every day. Our team doesn't just observe from a distance—we're actively studying platform-specific patterns, breaking down viral posts, and maintaining a constantly updated database of trends, tactics, and strategies. This hands-on approach allows us to understand what actually drives engagement and growth.

These observations are originally based on what we've learned through analyzing hundreds of viral posts and real-world performance data. But it was not enough. To back them up, we also needed to rely on trusted resources and case studies from major brands.

We prioritize accuracy and authority. Trends lacking solid data or performance metrics were excluded.

Trustworthiness is central to our work. Every source and citation is clearly listed, ensuring transparency. A writing AI-powered tool was used solely to refine readability and engagement.

To make the information accessible, our team designed custom infographics that clarify key points. We hope you will like them! All illustrations and media were created in-house and added manually.